Voided by an admin after review.
Some of you would rather lose $10k following a famous KOL than make $1k following a random account with actual conviction. Crypto has a credibility problem. Change my mind. @ratioed_xyz
A random account isn't automatically more credible, and a famous KOL isn't automatically right. Both should be judged by research, transparency, and track record. Conviction without research is gambling, regardless of who calls the play. @ratioed_xyz
| Metric | @PEGA_0x | @El_stoic0x | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Δ Likes | 3 | 0 | ×1 |
| Δ Reposts | 0 | 0 | ×3 |
| Δ Quotes | 0 | 0 | ×3 |
| Δ Replies | 0 | 1 | ×2 |
| Δ Views | 166 | 46 | norm. |
| Engagement E | 3 | 2 | |
| Rate R / 1k views | 3.0 | 2.0 | |
| Raw share (E) | 60.0% | 40.0% | 50% |
| Rate share (R) | 60.0% | 40.0% | 50% |
| Score | 60.0 | 40.0 | v1 |
Fewer than 10 engagement points so far — if it ends here the market voids.
E = 1·likes + 3·reposts + 3·quotes + 2·replies (growth since the battle started). R = E per 1k new views (floor 1k). Score = 50% raw share + 50% rate share. How scoring works
